Welcome to the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. Law Blog

Welcome to galisonlaw.com law blog. Our mission: to scour the universe for compelling stories in several related areas: DWI law, criminal law and and traffic law. Current changes in these laws offer broad interpretations, encompassing such recent news as the Leandra’s Law, and Jack Shea's law which eases restrictions on collecting blood in intoxication cases. We’ll write about industry news and legal trends, with a sprinkle of good old-fashioned gossip.

We’ll link to the best coverage of law and lawyers from around the Web, report some news of our own and look to you for contributions. We heartily invite your comments, tips and insights.

Along with my ruminations, this blog will include bits and bites from articles in the the New York Law Journal and Legal Newswires. Email me at david@galisonlaw.com.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Kings Point Video Surveillance

VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
Who's Watching

The incorporated village of Kings Point, located in Nassau County, New York, has recently initiated a video surveillance program that reeks of “Big Brother”. Video cameras are being installed at all entrances into the village so that every automobile’s license plate is recorded. The license plate information will then be sent electronically to databases to determine if the car or driver is wanted by any state or federal agency. If the car or driver is wanted the police will be immediately dispatched to stop the vehicle and presumably make an arrest. While proponents of this type of invasive electronic monitoring argue that if you have not broken the law you have nothing to worry about, one has to question the civil liberties implications. The government will be keeping an electronic log of when and where you have been, that is scary. That is right out of George Orwell’s book 1984. What is even more disturbing is that Kings Point is only 3.3 square miles and has its own police department. Does the village really need this system? Are the police incapable of competently patrolling this minute area or does Kings Park just have too much money?

Many of us are already familiar with the “Red Light Cameras” that have been popping up all over Long Island. These cameras take video of automobiles that pass through red lights. The owner of the vehicle is then sent a ticket with a web link to watch the video online of the vehicle as it passes through the red light. The fine is $50.00 with a $10.00 surcharge. What impact these cameras have on driver safety is debatable since slamming on one's brakes to avoid a ticket can cause an accident just as easily as running a red light.  What is not debatable is that these cameras are generating millions of dollars for the county. So is it the safety factor or revenue raising that has motivated the installation of these metal eye sores? I suggest that it is revenue raising.


 Facial recognition software is currently utilized at sporting events and other large gatherings to filter through crowds and find wanted individuals. If other communities follow Kings Point lead you may soon have you're every movement video taped once you step outside your door. I do not believe that government should be video monitoring lawful citizens in public even if it doesn’t violate the law. The next time that you pull up to a traffic light and see a video cameral just remember your being watched and it is being recorded.

Attorney Advertisment

  At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with the possession or sale of any drug, or are charged with any alcohol related driving offense in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County, contact the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at: David Galison, P.C.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Nassau County Police Officer Lynch Internal Investigation Reports

Nassau County DWI Cases and Probable Cause to Stop

      I have attached a link that every person that lives in Nassau County should read. It concerns Nassau County Police Department Officer Lynch, and an internal investigation regarding his practices when it comes to stopping and arresting individuals suspected of DWI. Actually, if you read the report you will find that there usually was not probable cause to stop the motorists in the first instance, and that the allegations against the Defendant's seem to have been manufactured to justify an unlawful investigation. This report should be seen by every juror and tax-payer in Nassau County and throughout the state of New York. It confirms what defense attorney's have been saying for years, that police officers should be given no more credibility then an average citizen when it comes to testimony in a trial. Police officers can and do lie in order to obtain convictions. It is very easy for a Police officer with years of experience and on the job training to exaggerate and even manufacture allegations in order to secure a conviction. 


       Think about it, if I wanted to convince a jury that you were intoxicated what would I say, what do the police say. They are trained to say and do say, "When I pulled over the motorist I observed the following"
  • A strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from the defendant's breath.
  • Glassy bloodshot eyes.
  • Slurred speech.
  • The defendant was unsteady on his/her feet.
  • Fumbled with his/her driver's license, or gave the wrong documents.
  • Failed all Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.
  • The list goes on and on....
        Mind you, not every motorist alleged to have committed the offense of DWI displays every sign of intoxication. However, if you sit on a jury in Nassau or Suffolk County in all likelihood you will hear all the items listed above and more. But when you do keep in mind that Police can lie and exaggerate just like any other witness. If you ever sit on a Jury and feel that the officer is exaggerating/lying you should vote to dismiss. A conviction should never stand on the shoulders of perjured testimony no matter how slight.

       As for Officer Lynch, he is still working as a police officer in Nassau County, and both you and I are paying his salary and benefits.

Attorney Advertisement

       At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with a DWI, a Drug Charge or even a Traffic Ticket give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at WWW.GALISONLAW.COM for further information.


Thursday, April 7, 2011

NASSAU COUNTY COURTS
CHALLENGING THE CLOSED 
NASSAU COUNTY CRIME LAB
DWI – Breath Testing

     Over the past several months I have received numerous phone calls regarding the Nassau County Crime Lab closure and it’s impact upon those who are currently fighting their DWI cases and those who are looking to re-open their cases. It has been my position that every effort should be made to challenge the results of all the breath testing equipment utilized by the police as the results are highly questionable in light of the disclosures concerning the now closed crime lab. How will the Nassau County Judiciary rule on cases in which the breath testing results are called into question. The answer at this time is unknown, however, there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

    Judge Sharon M.J. Gianelli* will be conducting hearings in the Nassau County District Court in the coming weeks dealing with the issues raised by the crime labs closure. The results of Judge Gianelli’s ruling will undoubtedly have a major impact upon how DWI cases are litigated in Nassau County and could open the floodgates to motions to set aside verdicts. Judge Gianelli is one of the most respected Judges in the Courthouse by both defense counsel and the prosecution. I have attached a copy of Judge Gianelli’s decision below but have redacted the name of the Defendant because I do not believe it is proper to publish it.

















































































































































*Judge Gianelli received her JD from Brooklyn Law School and was admitted to the Bar in 1989.

Attorney Advertisement

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with a DWI, a Drug Charge or even a Traffic Ticket give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at WWW.GALISONLAW.COM for further information.


Wednesday, March 30, 2011

NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KATHLEEN RICE
ISSUED LETTERS TO PRISON INMATES INFORMING THEM
OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE NOW DEFUNCT NASSAU COUNTY CRIME LAB

    The Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice has recently issued a letter to almost three hundred inmates informing them that the Nassau County Crime Lab may have made mistakes in connection with drug and alcohol charges they face. (See the letter below) The crime lab was ordered closed by County Executive Edward Mangano and is currently under investigation.

     The letter issued by Rice makes no mention of the fact that the lab has been shut down or that there is a possibility of criminal charges being filed against lab employees. Furthermore, the letter denies known deficiencies in blood alcohol testing, but admits that administrative errors in documentation and reporting have been uncovered. To this end, Margaret Fisher, a scientist at the lab has admitted to at least 9 known errors. The State Inspector General has recently issued subpoenas to County Executive Edward Mangano and former County Executive Thomas Suozzi in connection with the continuing investigation in which over 100 subpoenas have issued already. 

     For the time being the lab is closed and the door is locked with a key that is only held by the State Inspector General's Office and the head of Police Internal Affairs. In addition a video camera is mounted outside the lab to monitor the door just in case anyone should try to break in. 

     Just what impact the errors and deficiencies in testing and documenting will have on drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases is as of yet unknown. However one thing is certain, the credibility of every test done by the Nassau County Crime Lab is questionable at best. 

     


     At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with the possession or sale of any drug, or are charged with any alcohol related driving offense in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County, contact the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at: David Galison, P.C.

Attorney Advertisement


Sunday, March 27, 2011

Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison, P.C., Publishes New Legal Website


Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison, Publishes Website Providing Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County Residents with Valuable Information for Those Facing Criminal Charges in New York State.

Criminal Attorney Nassau County
Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison recently launched a new web site,      
http://www.criminalattorneynassaucounty.com  This latest website is one of several informational sites which are part of the Galison Law Legal Web Network.

David Galison, Managing Partner of the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. says that the new site  was designed in an effort to answer the most common questions that someone facing criminal charges in New York State could have. It also answers many questions for clients who are hesitant to call a criminal defense attorney to ask relevant questions which may impact their existing legal situation.

Galison said, “The information provided on this new website gives potential clients an understanding of my personalized service that sets my law office apart from other law firms,” he explains. “I encourage clients to keep fully informed of their case's progress and to actively participate in their defense throughout all stages of the proceedings.”

One feature of the new site is the frequently updated criminal law blog that David Galison updates and contributes to several times a week. The blog includes commentary and articles written by David Galison and includes coverage of legal issues pertaining to the Nassau County Court system. The blog invites your comments, tips and insights.

David Galison regularly appears in Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County Criminal Courts. Mr. Galison is licensed to practice law in the State Courts of New York, Florida and Massachussets, as well as the Eastern District Federal Court.

David Galison is a graduate of the Michigan State University College of Law where he graduated Magna Cum Laude. In addition, Mr. Galison received the Dean’s List Award in Commercial Transactions.

For more information, visit http://www.criminalattorneynassaucounty.com or contact David Galison at 516-424-4477 or by email to david@galisonlaw.com.

About The Law Office of David Galison, P.C.:

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., it is understood that an arrest and conviction for any crime can affect the rest of your life. With such serious consequences on the line, every client receives personalized attention. Clients are kept fully informed of their case's progress and actively participate in their defense throughout all stages of the proceedings. It is the personal service that David Galison, P.C. provides to the client that sets the office apart from other law firms.

# # #

Criminal Attorney Nassau County
The Law Offices of David Galison, P.C.
Attorney Answering to Criminal Charges in New York State.
Serving Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County, New York.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

TOP FIVE THINGS EVERY MOTORIST SHOULD KNOW
IF STOPPED BY A POLICE OFFICER
FOR A TRAFFIC TICKET OR A DWI

There are very few experiences in life that are more dreaded or feared then being pulled over by a police officer.  With the ever increasing costs of auto insurance and the state fines and surcharges associated with moving violations a motorist’s anxiety level can go through the roof.  If you have consumed any alcohol prior to the stop multiply this anxiety by ten.

1. The Stop. A motorist is under no obligation to answer any questions for a police officer. If you are pulled over by an officer the only information that you are required to provide is your license, registration and insurance. 

(Listed below is suggested conduct for a motorist to follow if stopped.)

Place your car in park and turn on your interior lights.
Have your license, registration and insurance in hand before the officer arrives at your window.
Keep your seatbelt on during the stop so that you do not get ticketed for failure to wear it. Often          times an officer will not believe that you took off the seatbelt to reach your documentation, so keep it on.
Be polite, but do not volunteer information. If you are asked, “Do you know why I stopped you?” answer no. The police write down your answers to be used against you.
Keep your hands where the officer can see them at all times. 
Never argue or raise your voice to the officer.
If you receive a ticket accept it graciously and consult with an attorney.

2. Roadside Tests. A motorist is under no obligation to perform any roadside field sobriety tests. If you are asked to exit the vehicle, there is an extremely high likelihood that the officer has already determined to arrest you for DWI. On the side of the road there is no fair judge of your performance and there is no video of how you perform. The only judge of your performance is a police officer who often times is going to make overtime based upon your arrest. 

Performing field sobriety tests under less then ideal conditions can affect the validity of the tests. Consider the following before you agree to do any DWI field sobriety testing. 

Are you tired?
Are you Nervous?
Are you uncoordinated?
Are you overweight by more then fifty pounds?
Do you have any medical conditions that can affect your balance?
Are you wearing appropriate footwear?
Is the location of the testing appropriate for the testing?

o Is it well lit?
o Is it level?
o Are there distractions close by like passing cars, or pedestrians?

You have the right to refuse standardized field sobriety tests.  If any of the above conditions are present it can have a major impact on the results of the testing which will then be used against you in court. Keep in mind that at this point in the stop you are likely to be arrested. The question is whether performing standard filed sobriety test in the field (on the road) will help exonerate you, often times they will not no matter how well you really perform. People fail sobriety tests when they are sober. Sobriety tests are subjective tests unless they are recorded with audio and video so that they can be judged fairly by others.  With all the factors that can affect DWI sobriety tests on the roadside it is often better to refuse all testing.

3. Breath Testing. Every motorist who is arrested and charged with a DWI in New York, is required to submit to a chemical test of their blood, breath or urine to determine their alleged blood alcohol concentration or BAC. Though a person has the right to refuse this testing (and often times should), a knowing refusal will result in the revocation of their driver’s license for a one year period if proper refusal warnings are given by the officer. The question then becomes do you give a breath sample. 

In considering the decision on whether or not to give a breath sample you should be aware of the following:

The Nassau County Crime Lab was closed in early 2011 because of departures from the minimum standards of care necessary to run a police crime lab. The crime lab was responsible for mixing the simulator solutions that the breath testing equipment in Nassau County utilizes. 
Kathleen Rice, the Nassau County District Attorney pointed out at a morning news conference that she asked county executive Mangano to shut the lab down "because supervisory activity and potentially intentional personnel conduct relate not only to the drug chemistry testing performed at the lab but to the entirety of the lab."
In Nassau County it is police policy that no video will be made of your performance tests (Standardized Field Sobriety Tests) if you take a breath test. In other words if you want to have a video made of your testing so that your performance can be judged by a neutral person (a jury) rather then a police officer you must refuse a breath test. Essentially, if you want a video made to show your innocence you must give up your driver’s license!! That is ridiculous and unfair.
Breath testing equipment is not perfect and it can make mistakes.
Consider the factors listed below as a partial list of items that can affect the reliability of the breath testing machines:

o If a person has a fever it can throw of the machine.
o If a person burps, regurgitates or has acid reflux it can throw off the machine.
o If a person has dentures it can throw of the machine.
o If a person blows for too long it can throw off the machine.
o If the mouth piece is not changed it can throw off the machine.
o If the chamber is not properly purged it can throw off the machine.
o If the person has certain chemical compounds in their system in can throw off the machine. (Painters, Carpenters, Chemists, etc…)
o If the persons blood to breath partition ratio deviates from the median it can throw off the machine, not everyone is in the middle of a bell curve. 
o There police do not wait 10 - 15 minutes and then perform a second test to confirm the results of the first test. Unfortunately if you believe the machine has made a mistake and request a second test you will be denied.

Juries often are kept in the dark about just how many things can go wrong with a breath testing machine despite the best efforts of the defense attorney. Deciding whether to take the breath test or not is a case specific decision, and often times the best decision is not to take the test, especially if you do not trust the police.

4. Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST). In Nassau County, Suffolk County and Queens County the decision to take SFST back at the station is a hard one. Often times you are being pressured to take tests that are not properly explained under conditions that would make anyone uncomfortable. As mentioned above in Nassau County DWI testing is not video taped unless you are willing to give up your license for a year! However, if you want the best evidence of your testing preserved you must refuse the breath test or no audio/video will be made. 

SFST testing is not an exact science and the results reported can vary on the same subject depending on who gives the test. All of the issues that can impact the roadside SFST testing listed above are present but add to that the pressure and nervousness of having been placed in handcuffs and told you are under arrest for the first time in your life. Under those conditions only you can decide if taking the tests would be fair and accurate. I believe that for the average person it is better to refuse the test as they are typically administered in an unfair and coercive manner. 

5. Call Your Attorney. Attorneys are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week to help you. Make sure that you have your attorneys name and phone number in your cell phone and in your wallet or purse. Do not speak or give a statement to the police without consulting with your attorney first. Be definitive.  Say “I want to talk to my attorney now.” And do not volunteer any information just wait with your mouth closed.

Attorney Advertisment

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with any driving offense from a speed contest to a red light ticket  to a DWI give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at for further informaiton: David Galison, P.C.


Tuesday, March 15, 2011


NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL
FOOT THE BILL TO RE-TEST DRUGS & BLOOD

It has recently been reported that the Nassau County Police Department will fund the retesting of close to 3,000 drug cases due to the improperly run crime lab. The cost is conservatively estimated to be between $400,000 and $500,000. It is unknown how much more it will cost to pay the lab workers who re-test the drugs to appear in court and give expert testimony on contested cases.

With respect to DWI cases, it is anticipated that blood alcohol tests will also be resubmitted for testing in light of the recent acknowledgment that several blood alcohol results were mislabeled.

There have been no arrests yet in connection with the crime lab fiasco, but an investigation is currently under way.