David Galison, P.C. Law Blog

Petit/Petty Larceny (Shoplifting) And Grand Larceny

2012-02-01T15:10:00.000-08:00

SHOPLIFTING ATTORNEY NASSAU COUNTY

Larceny and Grand Larceny

David Galison, P.C. Website

If you have been charged with a larceny crime in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County, call the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. immediately for a free consultation. A lawyer will answer your call and speak with you directly regarding the charges and your defenses. The phone number is 516-242-4477, and calls are answered 7 days a week

Shoplifting is one of the most common crimes charged in Nassau, Suffolk and Queens Counties. It is a theft crime and can be charged as a petit larceny or a grand larceny. A petty or petit larceny is theft of property valued at less then one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and a grand larceny is theft of property valued over one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).

Larceny can be charged as either a misdemeanor (petit larceny) or a felony (grand larceny) depending on the value of the item taken and the manner in which the item is taken. For example; taking a wallet from a store without paying for it would be charged as a misdemeanor petit larceny, however, taking a wallet from a person (pick-pocketing) would be charged as a felony grand larceny.

The consequences of a conviction for a petty larceny can vary from up to one year in jail to three years probation or just a fine and surcharges. And although it is not typical for a first time offender to be placed in jail the social stigma that is attached to a conviction could affect future employment and professional licensing, as well as, immigration and naturalization.

A conviction for grand larceny carries with it the potential for a sentence of more then one year in upstate prison or five years probation. However, under certain circumstances a sentence of a fine, and state surcharges can occur with no jail or probation being ordered.

With the consequences of a larceny related conviction being so severe it is of utmost importance to retain an experienced criminal defense attorney who will fight to protect your rights. Whether it is taking your case to trial or negotiating a favorable plea bargain the law office of David Galison, P.C., will stand by your side throughout all stages of the case.

Call the office today at 516-242-4477 for a Free Consultation.

Attorney Advertisement

The New York State Penal Law defines Larceny as follows:

§ 155.05 Larceny; defined.

1. A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner thereof.

2. Larceny includes a wrongful taking, obtaining or withholding of another's property, with the intent prescribed in subdivision one of this section, committed in any of the following ways:

(a) By conduct heretofore defined or known as common law larceny by trespassory taking, common law larceny by trick, embezzlement, or obtaining property by false pretenses;

(b) By acquiring lost property. A person acquires lost property when he exercises control over property of another which he knows to have been lost or mislaid, or to have been delivered under a mistake as to the identity of the recipient or the nature or amount of the property, without taking reasonable measures to return such property to the owner;

(d) By false promise. A person obtains property by false promise when, pursuant to a scheme to defraud, he obtains property of another by means of a representation, express or implied, that he or a third person will in the future engage in particular conduct, and when he does not intend to engage in such conduct or, as the case may be, does not believe that the third person intends to engage in such conduct. In any prosecution for larceny based upon a false promise, the defendant's intention or belief that the promise would not be performed may not be established by or inferred from the fact alone that such promise was not performed. Such a finding may be based only upon evidence establishing that the facts and circumstances of the case are wholly consistent with guilty intent or belief and wholly inconsistent with innocent intent or belief, and excluding to a moral certainty every hypothesis except that of the defendant's intention or belief that the promise would not be performed;

Nassau County Speeding Ticket Attorney

2012-01-26T12:49:00.000-08:00

Speeding Ticket Lawyer Nassau County

If you have received a speeding ticket in Nassau County New York, you should allow the law firm of David Galison, P.C, to handle the violation on your behalf. (See Traffic Ticket Website)

Nassau County employs experienced trial attorneys to prosecute and litigate tickets to the fullest. Therefore, you should have, and you have the right to have, an experienced attorney representing you.

An experienced attorney can help you litigate and try to minimize the potential consequences of a traffic violation. See Points Chart and also NYSDMV Brochure

Most people don’t realize the ramifications that accompany a traffic ticket conviction.

For example:

· A speeding ticket conviction may result in a minimum of 3 points and a maximum of 11 points being added to your drivers’ license, depending upon how many miles over the speed limit you are convicted of driving.
· Insurance carriers use these points against you and can raise your insurance premiums for 36 months if points are added to your license for any moving violation.
· In the event that you receive 3 speeding ticket convictions within 18 months, or accumulate more then 10 points on your license within 18 months, the Department of Motor Vehicles will either suspend or revoke your driver’s license.
· And, if you are found to have been driving excessively fast or recklessly, a Judge can even put you in jail.

I am an experienced attorney who has been handling traffic and criminal matters for over a decade. In most cases, I can appear in court without your presence being necessary, thus saving you time from loss of work and other important obligations.

Call the office today at 516-242-4477 to schedule a free consultation and find out how I can assist you in fighting your traffic ticket.

Attorney Advertisement

Below is a list of the Nassau County Courts that I can be retained to appear at.

16 Cooper Street, Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency (NCT&PVA)

Atlantic Beach Village Court

Baxter Estate Village Court

Bayville Village Court

Bellerose Village Court

Brookville Village Court

Cedarhurst Village Court

Centre Island Village Court

Cove Neck Village Court

East Hills Village Court

East Rockaway Village Court

East Williston Village Court

Farmingdale Village Court

Floral Park Village Court

Flower Hill Village Court

Fractal Village Court

Freeport Village Court

Garden City Village Court

Glen Cove City Court

Great Neck Estates Village Court

Great Neck Plaza Village Court

Great Neck Village Court

Hempstead Village Court

Hewlett Bay Park Village Court

Island Park Village Court

Kensington Village Court

Kings Point Village Court

Lake Success Village Court

Lattingtown Village Court

Laurel Hollow Village Court

Lawrence Village Court

Long Beach City Court

Lynbrook Village Court

Malverne Village Court

Manorhaven Village Court

Massapequa Park Village Court

Matinecock Village Court

Mill Neck Village Court

Mineola Village Court

Munsey Park Village Court

Muttontown Village Court

Nassau County Court

Nassau County District Court - 1st District - Criminal Court

Nassau County District Court, 2nd District - Hempstead

Nassau County District Court, 3rd District - Great Neck

Nassau County District Court, 4th District (Glen Cove & Oyster Bay)

Nassau County Traffic Court

New Hyde Park Village Court

North Hills Village Court

Old Brookville Village Court

Old Westbury Village Court

Oyster Bay Cove Village Court

Plandome Heights Village Court

Plandome Manor Village Court

Plandome Village Court

Port Washington North Village Court

Rockville Centre Village Court

Roslyn Estates Village Court

Roslyn Harbor Village Court

Roslyn Village Court

Russell Gardens Village Court

Saddle Rock Village Court

Sands Point Village Court

Sea Cliff Village Court

South Floral Park Village Court

Stewart Manor Village Court

Thomaston Village Court

Upper Brookville Village Court

Valley Stream Village Court

Westbury Village Court

Williston Park Village Court

Woodsburgh Village Court

Speeding Tickets Nassau County

• Red Light Tickets Nassau County
• Stop Sign Tickets Nassau County
• Passing a School Bus Nassau County
• Failure to Signal Nassau County
• Unsafe Lane Change Nassau County
• Illegal U-Turn Nassau County
• Cell Phone/Texting while driving Nassau County

Kings Point Video Surveillance

2011-04-28T20:19:00.000-07:00

VIDEO SURVEILLANCE

Who's Watching

The incorporated village of Kings Point, located in Nassau County, New York, has recently initiated a video surveillance program that reeks of “Big Brother”. Video cameras are being installed at all entrances into the village so that every automobile’s license plate is recorded. The license plate information will then be sent electronically to databases to determine if the car or driver is wanted by any state or federal agency. If the car or driver is wanted the police will be immediately dispatched to stop the vehicle and presumably make an arrest. While proponents of this type of invasive electronic monitoring argue that if you have not broken the law you have nothing to worry about, one has to question the civil liberties implications. The government will be keeping an electronic log of when and where you have been, that is scary. That is right out of George Orwell’s book 1984. What is even more disturbing is that Kings Point is only 3.3 square miles and has its own police department. Does the village really need this system? Are the police incapable of competently patrolling this minute area or does Kings Park just have too much money?

Many of us are already familiar with the “Red Light Cameras” that have been popping up all over Long Island. These cameras take video of automobiles that pass through red lights. The owner of the vehicle is then sent a ticket with a web link to watch the video online of the vehicle as it passes through the red light. The fine is $50.00 with a $10.00 surcharge. What impact these cameras have on driver safety is debatable since slamming on one's brakes to avoid a ticket can cause an accident just as easily as running a red light. What is not debatable is that these cameras are generating millions of dollars for the county. So is it the safety factor or revenue raising that has motivated the installation of these metal eye sores? I suggest that it is revenue raising.

Facial recognition software is currently utilized at sporting events and other large gatherings to filter through crowds and find wanted individuals. If other communities follow Kings Point lead you may soon have you're every movement video taped once you step outside your door. I do not believe that government should be video monitoring lawful citizens in public even if it doesn’t violate the law. The next time that you pull up to a traffic light and see a video cameral just remember your being watched and it is being recorded.

Attorney Advertisment

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with the possession or sale of any drug, or are charged with any alcohol related driving offense in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County, contact the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at: David Galison, P.C.

Nassau County Police Officer Lynch Internal Investigation Reports

2011-04-13T22:44:00.000-07:00

Nassau County DWI Cases and Probable Cause to Stop

I have attached a link that every person that lives in Nassau County should read. It concerns Nassau County Police Department Officer Lynch, and an internal investigation regarding his practices when it comes to stopping and arresting individuals suspected of DWI. Actually, if you read the report you will find that there usually was not probable cause to stop the motorists in the first instance, and that the allegations against the Defendant's seem to have been manufactured to justify an unlawful investigation. This report should be seen by every juror and tax-payer in Nassau County and throughout the state of New York. It confirms what defense attorney's have been saying for years, that police officers should be given no more credibility then an average citizen when it comes to testimony in a trial. Police officers can and do lie in order to obtain convictions. It is very easy for a Police officer with years of experience and on the job training to exaggerate and even manufacture allegations in order to secure a conviction.

Police Officer Lynch Internal Investigation

Think about it, if I wanted to convince a jury that you were intoxicated what would I say, what do the police say. They are trained to say and do say, "When I pulled over the motorist I observed the following"

A strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from the defendant's breath.
Glassy bloodshot eyes.
Slurred speech.
The defendant was unsteady on his/her feet.
Fumbled with his/her driver's license, or gave the wrong documents.
Failed all Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.
The list goes on and on....

Mind you, not every motorist alleged to have committed the offense of DWI displays every sign of intoxication. However, if you sit on a jury in Nassau or Suffolk County in all likelihood you will hear all the items listed above and more. But when you do keep in mind that Police can lie and exaggerate just like any other witness. If you ever sit on a Jury and feel that the officer is exaggerating/lying you should vote to dismiss. A conviction should never stand on the shoulders of perjured testimony no matter how slight.

As for Officer Lynch, he is still working as a police officer in Nassau County, and both you and I are paying his salary and benefits.

Attorney Advertisement

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with a DWI, a Drug Charge or even a Traffic Ticket give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at WWW.GALISONLAW.COM for further information.

2011-04-07T11:37:00.000-07:00

NASSAU COUNTY COURTS

CHALLENGING THE CLOSED

NASSAU COUNTY CRIME LAB

DWI – Breath Testing

Over the past several months I have received numerous phone calls regarding the Nassau County Crime Lab closure and it’s impact upon those who are currently fighting their DWI cases and those who are looking to re-open their cases. It has been my position that every effort should be made to challenge the results of all the breath testing equipment utilized by the police as the results are highly questionable in light of the disclosures concerning the now closed crime lab. How will the Nassau County Judiciary rule on cases in which the breath testing results are called into question. The answer at this time is unknown, however, there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

Judge Sharon M.J. Gianelli* will be conducting hearings in the Nassau County District Court in the coming weeks dealing with the issues raised by the crime labs closure. The results of Judge Gianelli’s ruling will undoubtedly have a major impact upon how DWI cases are litigated in Nassau County and could open the floodgates to motions to set aside verdicts. Judge Gianelli is one of the most respected Judges in the Courthouse by both defense counsel and the prosecution. I have attached a copy of Judge Gianelli’s decision below but have redacted the name of the Defendant because I do not believe it is proper to publish it.

*Judge Gianelli received her JD from Brooklyn Law School and was admitted to the Bar in 1989.

Attorney Advertisement

2011-03-30T20:40:00.000-07:00

NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KATHLEEN RICE

ISSUED LETTERS TO PRISON INMATES INFORMING THEM

OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE NOW DEFUNCT NASSAU COUNTY CRIME LAB

The Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice has recently issued a letter to almost three hundred inmates informing them that the Nassau County Crime Lab may have made mistakes in connection with drug and alcohol charges they face. (See the letter below) The crime lab was ordered closed by County Executive Edward Mangano and is currently under investigation.

The letter issued by Rice makes no mention of the fact that the lab has been shut down or that there is a possibility of criminal charges being filed against lab employees. Furthermore, the letter denies known deficiencies in blood alcohol testing, but admits that administrative errors in documentation and reporting have been uncovered. To this end, Margaret Fisher, a scientist at the lab has admitted to at least 9 known errors. The State Inspector General has recently issued subpoenas to County Executive Edward Mangano and former County Executive Thomas Suozzi in connection with the continuing investigation in which over 100 subpoenas have issued already.

For the time being the lab is closed and the door is locked with a key that is only held by the State Inspector General's Office and the head of Police Internal Affairs. In addition a video camera is mounted outside the lab to monitor the door just in case anyone should try to break in.

Just what impact the errors and deficiencies in testing and documenting will have on drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases is as of yet unknown. However one thing is certain, the credibility of every test done by the Nassau County Crime Lab is questionable at best.

Attorney Advertisement

Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison, P.C., Publishes New Legal Website

2011-03-27T21:23:00.000-07:00

Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison, Publishes Website Providing Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County Residents with Valuable Information for Those Facing Criminal Charges in New York State.

Criminal Attorney Nassau County

Nassau County Criminal Attorney David Galison recently launched a new web site,
http://www.criminalattorneynassaucounty.com This latest website is one of several informational sites which are part of the Galison Law Legal Web Network.

David Galison, Managing Partner of the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. says that the new site was designed in an effort to answer the most common questions that someone facing criminal charges in New York State could have. It also answers many questions for clients who are hesitant to call a criminal defense attorney to ask relevant questions which may impact their existing legal situation.

Galison said, “The information provided on this new website gives potential clients an understanding of my personalized service that sets my law office apart from other law firms,” he explains. “I encourage clients to keep fully informed of their case's progress and to actively participate in their defense throughout all stages of the proceedings.”

One feature of the new site is the frequently updated criminal law blog that David Galison updates and contributes to several times a week. The blog includes commentary and articles written by David Galison and includes coverage of legal issues pertaining to the Nassau County Court system. The blog invites your comments, tips and insights.

David Galison regularly appears in Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County Criminal Courts. Mr. Galison is licensed to practice law in the State Courts of New York, Florida and Massachussets, as well as the Eastern District Federal Court.

David Galison is a graduate of the Michigan State University College of Law where he graduated Magna Cum Laude. In addition, Mr. Galison received the Dean’s List Award in Commercial Transactions.

For more information, visit http://www.criminalattorneynassaucounty.com or contact David Galison at 516-424-4477 or by email to david@galisonlaw.com.

About The Law Office of David Galison, P.C.:

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., it is understood that an arrest and conviction for any crime can affect the rest of your life. With such serious consequences on the line, every client receives personalized attention. Clients are kept fully informed of their case's progress and actively participate in their defense throughout all stages of the proceedings. It is the personal service that David Galison, P.C. provides to the client that sets the office apart from other law firms.

# # #

Criminal Attorney Nassau County
The Law Offices of David Galison, P.C.
Attorney Answering to Criminal Charges in New York State.
Serving Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County, New York.

2011-03-24T22:19:00.000-07:00

TOP FIVE THINGS EVERY MOTORIST SHOULD KNOW

IF STOPPED BY A POLICE OFFICER

FOR A TRAFFIC TICKET OR A DWI

There are very few experiences in life that are more dreaded or feared then being pulled over by a police officer. With the ever increasing costs of auto insurance and the state fines and surcharges associated with moving violations a motorist’s anxiety level can go through the roof. If you have consumed any alcohol prior to the stop multiply this anxiety by ten.

1. The Stop. A motorist is under no obligation to answer any questions for a police officer. If you are pulled over by an officer the only information that you are required to provide is your license, registration and insurance.

(Listed below is suggested conduct for a motorist to follow if stopped.)

• Place your car in park and turn on your interior lights.

• Have your license, registration and insurance in hand before the officer arrives at your window.

• Keep your seatbelt on during the stop so that you do not get ticketed for failure to wear it. Often times an officer will not believe that you took off the seatbelt to reach your documentation, so keep it on.

• Be polite, but do not volunteer information. If you are asked, “Do you know why I stopped you?” answer no. The police write down your answers to be used against you.

• Keep your hands where the officer can see them at all times.

• Never argue or raise your voice to the officer.

• If you receive a ticket accept it graciously and consult with an attorney.

2. Roadside Tests. A motorist is under no obligation to perform any roadside field sobriety tests. If you are asked to exit the vehicle, there is an extremely high likelihood that the officer has already determined to arrest you for DWI. On the side of the road there is no fair judge of your performance and there is no video of how you perform. The only judge of your performance is a police officer who often times is going to make overtime based upon your arrest.

Performing field sobriety tests under less then ideal conditions can affect the validity of the tests. Consider the following before you agree to do any DWI field sobriety testing.

• Are you tired?

• Are you Nervous?

• Are you uncoordinated?

• Are you overweight by more then fifty pounds?

• Do you have any medical conditions that can affect your balance?

• Are you wearing appropriate footwear?

• Is the location of the testing appropriate for the testing?

o Is it well lit?

o Is it level?

o Are there distractions close by like passing cars, or pedestrians?

You have the right to refuse standardized field sobriety tests. If any of the above conditions are present it can have a major impact on the results of the testing which will then be used against you in court. Keep in mind that at this point in the stop you are likely to be arrested. The question is whether performing standard filed sobriety test in the field (on the road) will help exonerate you, often times they will not no matter how well you really perform. People fail sobriety tests when they are sober. Sobriety tests are subjective tests unless they are recorded with audio and video so that they can be judged fairly by others. With all the factors that can affect DWI sobriety tests on the roadside it is often better to refuse all testing.

3. Breath Testing. Every motorist who is arrested and charged with a DWI in New York, is required to submit to a chemical test of their blood, breath or urine to determine their alleged blood alcohol concentration or BAC. Though a person has the right to refuse this testing (and often times should), a knowing refusal will result in the revocation of their driver’s license for a one year period if proper refusal warnings are given by the officer. The question then becomes do you give a breath sample.

In considering the decision on whether or not to give a breath sample you should be aware of the following:

• The Nassau County Crime Lab was closed in early 2011 because of departures from the minimum standards of care necessary to run a police crime lab. The crime lab was responsible for mixing the simulator solutions that the breath testing equipment in Nassau County utilizes.

• Kathleen Rice, the Nassau County District Attorney pointed out at a morning news conference that she asked county executive Mangano to shut the lab down "because supervisory activity and potentially intentional personnel conduct relate not only to the drug chemistry testing performed at the lab but to the entirety of the lab."

• In Nassau County it is police policy that no video will be made of your performance tests (Standardized Field Sobriety Tests) if you take a breath test. In other words if you want to have a video made of your testing so that your performance can be judged by a neutral person (a jury) rather then a police officer you must refuse a breath test. Essentially, if you want a video made to show your innocence you must give up your driver’s license!! That is ridiculous and unfair.

• Breath testing equipment is not perfect and it can make mistakes.

• Consider the factors listed below as a partial list of items that can affect the reliability of the breath testing machines:

o If a person has a fever it can throw of the machine.

o If a person burps, regurgitates or has acid reflux it can throw off the machine.

o If a person has dentures it can throw of the machine.

o If a person blows for too long it can throw off the machine.

o If the mouth piece is not changed it can throw off the machine.

o If the chamber is not properly purged it can throw off the machine.

o If the person has certain chemical compounds in their system in can throw off the machine. (Painters, Carpenters, Chemists, etc…)

o If the persons blood to breath partition ratio deviates from the median it can throw off the machine, not everyone is in the middle of a bell curve.

o There police do not wait 10 - 15 minutes and then perform a second test to confirm the results of the first test. Unfortunately if you believe the machine has made a mistake and request a second test you will be denied.

Juries often are kept in the dark about just how many things can go wrong with a breath testing machine despite the best efforts of the defense attorney. Deciding whether to take the breath test or not is a case specific decision, and often times the best decision is not to take the test, especially if you do not trust the police.

4. Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST). In Nassau County, Suffolk County and Queens County the decision to take SFST back at the station is a hard one. Often times you are being pressured to take tests that are not properly explained under conditions that would make anyone uncomfortable. As mentioned above in Nassau County DWI testing is not video taped unless you are willing to give up your license for a year! However, if you want the best evidence of your testing preserved you must refuse the breath test or no audio/video will be made.

SFST testing is not an exact science and the results reported can vary on the same subject depending on who gives the test. All of the issues that can impact the roadside SFST testing listed above are present but add to that the pressure and nervousness of having been placed in handcuffs and told you are under arrest for the first time in your life. Under those conditions only you can decide if taking the tests would be fair and accurate. I believe that for the average person it is better to refuse the test as they are typically administered in an unfair and coercive manner.

5. Call Your Attorney. Attorneys are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week to help you. Make sure that you have your attorneys name and phone number in your cell phone and in your wallet or purse. Do not speak or give a statement to the police without consulting with your attorney first. Be definitive. Say “I want to talk to my attorney now.” And do not volunteer any information just wait with your mouth closed.

Attorney Advertisment

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with any driving offense from a speed contest to a red light ticket to a DWI give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at for further informaiton: David Galison, P.C.

GALISONLAW WEBSITE

2011-03-15T17:19:00.000-07:00

NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL

FOOT THE BILL TO RE-TEST DRUGS & BLOOD

It has recently been reported that the Nassau County Police Department will fund the retesting of close to 3,000 drug cases due to the improperly run crime lab. The cost is conservatively estimated to be between $400,000 and $500,000. It is unknown how much more it will cost to pay the lab workers who re-test the drugs to appear in court and give expert testimony on contested cases.

With respect to DWI cases, it is anticipated that blood alcohol tests will also be resubmitted for testing in light of the recent acknowledgment that several blood alcohol results were mislabeled.

There have been no arrests yet in connection with the crime lab fiasco, but an investigation is currently under way.

2011-03-09T21:25:00.000-08:00

NASSAU COUNTY, NEW YORK

DWI - AGGRAVATED VEHICULAR ASSAULT

CONVICTION THROWN OUT

On Monday March 7^th, 2011 the Honorable Judge George Peck handed down his eagerly awaited decision in connection with the Erin Marino case. Ms. Marino had been convicted of aggravated vehicular assault for allegedly running into a minivan while being intoxicated by alcohol. The judges decision to throw out the conviction was based upon newly discovered evidence which disclosed improper testing at the Nassau County Crime Lab and possibly a cover up. At the time of the conviction in August 2010 it was not know how poorly the Nassau County Crime Lab was being operated. But when the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors placed the lab on probation, the Pandora’s box was opened and all the lab’s secrets came pouring out.

· The Nassau County Crime Lab has since been ordered closed indefinitely by the county executive.
· The Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice petitioned the court to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the lab but said petition was denied.
· The Governor, Andrew M. Cuomo then appointed State Inspector General Ellen Biben to investigate the lab.
· Retesting of prior lab results have come back as inaccurate and wrong.
· Blood alcohol samples have been mislabeled in DWI prosecutions.

Although the Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice is known for being outspoken, she has remained silent in connection with the judges ruling. Perhaps even Ms. Rice can’t keep a straight face when arguing that the ruling is wrong, although it has been disclosed that the District Attorney’s Office plans on appealing Judge Peck’s decision.

How an argument can be made that the ruling is wrong by the same office that sought the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate a possible cover up and potential illegal activity is mindboggling. As for Judge Peck’s decision, I applaud it. It’s encouraging to see that Judges in Nassau County will analyze the facts and apply the law. When a judge protects the rights of the accused he protects all citizens. It was John Adams who defended the British soldiers in the Boston Massacre trial. Mr. Adams stated: "Facts are stubborn things and whatever may be our inclinations, or the dictums of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." The evidence is irrefutable the lab is closed!

2011-03-04T06:20:00.000-08:00

140 MPH Race On The Long Island Expressway

Can You Say Traffic Ticket

Two motorists who were allegedly racing each other on the Long Island Expressway yesterday reached speeds of over 140 mph just before they crashed their vehicles in Suffolk County. One of the vehicles burst into flames upon impact when it a collided with a gas pump at a Gulf station in Islandia. Remarkably only one person was injured in the incident.

The drivers are facing the following charges:

· Unlawful speed contest
· Reckless endangerment
· Reckless driving
· Criminal mischief
· Unlawful fleeing of a police officer
· Speeding

In Nassau, Suffolk and Queens counties speed contests are prosecuted harshly. Often times as in the case above motorists engaging in speed contests are prosecuted under both the penal law and the vehicle and traffic law. In addition to fines, state surcharges, drivers responsibility assessment act liability, possible license suspension or revocation, and points on their DMV abstract the motorist are facing significant jail time. In addition the ability to drive in the future will be hampered by the cost of increased insurance premiums if an auto insurance carrier will even agree to insure them.

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with the any driving offense from a speed contest to a red light ticket give us a call. Call 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at for further informaiton: David Galison, P.C.

Attorney Advertisment

2011-02-27T20:07:00.000-08:00

Special Investigator Appointed To Investigate The

Nassau County Crime Lab

Drug Prosecutions and DWI Prosecutions Under Question

Even though it has been only one week since the Nassau County Crime Lab was closed by Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, the New York State Governor, Andrew M. Cuomo, has already appointed State Inspector General Ellen Biben to investigate the lab. Initially, Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice tried to have Eric Dinallo, Esq., appointed special prosecutor to investigate the lab, but the proposed appointment was rejected by acting Supreme Court Justice William Donnino.

Eric Dinallo is a partner in the Manhattan law firm of Debevoise & Plimpton, L.L.P., and was a Democratic runner last fall for Attorney General. Rice who had sought to appoint Dinallo, was disappointed earlier this week when Judge William Donnino, the supervising judge of the county court in Nassau, denied her request. Before deciding on the appointment, Judge Donnino pointed out that state law requires a special prosecutor to live in the county where he or she will serve or have an office in an adjoining county. Dinallo conveniently had obtained an office in Nassau County at RXR Plaza in Uniondale on Tuesday morning, the day before Rice requested that the Manhattan attorney be appointed special investigator of the crime lab. Clearly, the office was set-up for the sole purpose of attempting to comply with the state law cited by the Supreme Court justice. Judge Donnino pointed out that in open-ended cases such as this, where the investigation could lead to criminal arrests, it is the governor’s office that should appoint a special prosecutor or special investigator, thus superseding the district attorney’s choice. However, it is not surprising that District Attorney Rice attempted to take it upon herself to name the special investigator with all that is on the line. If the special investigator determines that any wrongdoings took place in the lab, it could lead to thousands of prosecutions handled under Rice’s administration being challenged and possibly overturned.

Rice was quoted as saying, “We will continue to make sure this case receives the most fair and aggressive examination possible and this decision will not deter that effort.” She further stated, “We are moving quickly to ask the governor to appoint a special prosecutor so we can begin the process of restoring the faith that the public deserves to have in its criminal justice system.” At least implicitly in her statement, Rice acknowledges that the public has lost faith, to some extent, in the criminal justice system in Nassau County. How damaged the public’s faith in the criminal justice system is has yet to be determined, particularly in light of the police department lab being closed and its employees and supervisors currently under investigation.

Following Judge Donnino’s rejection of Rice’s proposed appointment, Inspector General Ellen Biben was appointed by Governor Cuomo to investigate the Nassau County Crime Lab. Both the Nassau County Executive and the District Attorney’s office subsequently expressed approval of the governor’s “swift action” in the appointment. What choice did they really have, for Rice anything but approval would look like she was trying to hide something, especially after her own hand picked selection was denied.

The Nassau Count Crime Lab will now be investigated for known and suspected mistakes in lab analysis of evidence in both drug and alcohol related cases. Just who knew what, and when they knew it, is going to be one of the focuses of the investigation. Hundred is not thousands of Driving While Intoxicated and drug convictions could be affected by the results of the investigation.

As for Ms. Biben, her credentials speak for themselves, as outlined below:

· Named Inspector General on January 1, 2011 by Governor Guomo.

· Served as Deputy Attorney General for Public Integrity.

· Lead prosecutor against political consultant Hank Morris.

· Served ten years as an Assistant Manhattan District Attorney.

· Deputy Bureau Chief of the Rackets Bureau for five years while in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

It is uncertain at this point what will be discovered during the investigation. It will be interesting to see if criminal charges will be filed against any Nassau County police officers or supervisors in connection with the lab issues. The investigation should also reveal when the District Attorney’s Office learned about the problems at the lab and if they disclosed their knowledge in the appropriate amount of time.

Attorney Advertisment

2011-02-20T17:05:00.000-08:00

NASSAU COUNTY CRIME LAB

ORDERED CLOSED INDEFINITELY

Photo credit: Newsday website, a file photo of the Nassau County Police crime lab in Mineola, edited.

On Friday, February 18, 2011, the Nassau County Crime Lab was ordered closed by County Executive Edward Mangano. The closure of the crime lab is based upon allegations that Nassau County Police supervisors may have know, as early as September of last year, about inaccuracies in the testing of the drug Ecstasy. Kathleen Rice, the District Attorney of Nassau County, was quoted in Newsday as saying that she had asked County Executive Mangano to shut down the lab “because supervisory activity and potentially intentional personnel conduct relate not only to the drug chemistry testing performed at the lab but to the entirety of the lab.”

Prior to the closure of the Nassau County Crime Lab, the lab had the dubious distinction of being the only police lab in the country to have been placed on probation twice. The American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors had placed the lab on probation back in 2005 and again most recently in December 2010. The recent probationary status was due to 15 serious violations that authorities found in the lab. Among the violations listed were defects in the maintenance and calibration of the equipment that measures blood alcohol.

The county’s Acting Director of the Forensic Evidence Bureau, Pasquale Buffolino, Ph.D., recently issued a letter to Mr. Robert Stacey, Staff Inspector of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, which addressed the violations. To view the letter that addresses the labs deficiencies click on the following link: Crime Lab Issues

As a result of the lab’s failure to properly perform drug testing, and maintain and calibrate the equipment used to measure blood alcohol, motions are currently being brought by Nassau County defense attorneys to set aside criminal convictions. Roughly 9,000 drug cases from between 2007 to 2009 are being called into question. The number of DWI cases that could be affected by recent revelations is unknown at this time but clearly it is significant.

Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) cases where breath readings were taken using machines maintained by the Nassau County Police Department are particularly troubling since it has been revealed that the calibration devices in the police lab were not checked yearly as is required by national standards. The lab’s failure to adhere to national standards makes prosecuting these cases questionable, difficult and perhaps unjust.

What is even more troubling for the Nassau County Police Department and District Attorney’s Office is that on Thursday, February 17, 2011, Detective Lieutenant James Granelle, former Nassau County Crime Lab Director, admitted while testifying before the Honorable George Peck that he had informed his commanding officer(s) about the problems at the lab as early as 2006.

Meg Reiss, Kathleen Rice’s chief of staff, indicated recently that U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch, who heads the Eastern District of New York, will be keeping in touch with Rice and may step in if it becomes necessary. The Nassau County Police Department and District Attorney’s Office are each conducting their own investigations into the issues with the police lab, however many defense attorneys say this is not enough and that a special investigator should be appointed.

Newsday has had excellent coverage of the Nassau County Crime Lab fiasco, for more information visit the following link, Newsday Coverage

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with the possession or sale of any drug or alcohol related driving offense in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County, contact the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case. Visit our website at: David Galison, P.C.

Attorney Advertisement

Leandra's Law

2011-02-18T15:46:00.000-08:00

LEANDRA’S LAW

Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) With A Child In the Vehicle

Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 1192.2 2-b (Leandra’s Law) reads as follows: Aggravated driving while intoxicated. With a child. No person shall operate a motor vehicle in violation of subdivision two, three, four or four-a of this section while a child who is fifteen years of age or less is a passenger in such motor vehicle.

Leandra’s Law was recently passed by the New York State legislature and went into effect on August 15, 2010. The purpose of Leandra’s Law is to elevate the crime of Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) from a misdemeanor offense to a felony offense when a child who is fifteen years of age or younger is a passenger in a motor vehicle being operated by an intoxicated driver.

The elevation of DWI from a misdemeanor to a felony results in substantial sentence enhancements. A misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in jail whereas an E felony is punishable by up to four years in state prison. Additional sanctions for a violation of Leandra’s Law (§1192.2 2-b) include the following:

· Automatic license suspension pending prosecution

· Installation of an ignition interlock system for at least six months*

· Up to 25 years in state prison when a child passenger under age 16 dies in a DWI crash

· Up to 15 years in state prison when a child passenger under age 16 is injured in a DWI crash

· Reporting by arresting agency to Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment

· A fine of $1,000.00 to $5,000.00 plus state surcharges

In light of these potentially serious consequences, it is important to retain the services of a qualified attorney to defend your case, even if you are a first time offender. The Law Office of David Galison P.C., will explore every defense to an allegation of DWI and will vigorously defend all charges against you. Just because you are alleged to have committed the offense of drunk driving (DWI) does not mean that you are guilty. People and equipment can make mistakes.

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected. If you are charged with an alcohol related driving offense in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens County contact the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION to discuss your case.

See the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services Website for additional detailed information.

For a complete reading of the DWI Statute for the State of New York visit: Consolidated Laws of The State of New York

*Links to ignition interlock device companies, with demonstration videos:

CELL PHONE TICKETS

2011-02-17T10:51:00.001-08:00

CELLULAR PHONE TICKETS IN

NEW YORK NOW CARRY THREE (3) POINTS

Think twice before answering your cell phone if you’re driving a motor vehicle in New York. A motorist who is ticketed for talking on the cell phone without a hands free device will now receive two points on their driver’s license if they are convicted. While three (3) points may not seem like a lot consider the following:

• Insurance carriers can raise your premiums for years based upon the amount of points on your license.

• Your license can be suspended or revoked if you receive more then 10 points on your drivers license within an 18 month period of time.

• If you receive six (6) or more points on your drivers license within an 18 month period of time you are subject to the Drivers Responsibility Assessment Act. *

Nassau, Suffolk and Queens counties are sure to start issuing traffic tickets for these cell phone driving violations, as part of a show of force in support of the new legislation. These enhanced efforts to ticket drivers who do not use hands free devices can be expected to last for the foreseeable future in hopes that it will create a deterrence effect. According to Newsday on February 16th, 2011 Suffolk County Sheriffs issued 19 cell phone tickets in the morning rush alone, while Nassau County Police issued 3 cell phone tickets as of the afternoon.

Given the potential serious consequences outlined above it is extremely important to retain the services of a qualified attorney to defend your case. Traffic tickets can be dismissed if the police don’t prove every element of the offense alleged. At the law office of David Galison, P.C., we strive to ensure that your rights are protected, and we explore every possible defense available. If you are charged with any traffic violation, please call the law office of David Galison, P.C. at 516-242-4477 to setup a Free consultation to discuss your case. Law Office of David Galison, P.C.

The office of David Galison, P.C., routinely defends drivers charged with the following traffic related offenses: speeding tickets, red light tickets, stop sign tickets, cell phone tickets, failure to signal tickets, failure to maintain lane tickets, driving on a suspended or revoked license, driving while intoxicated and driving while impaired.

In Nassau County the majority of traffic tickets are handled by the Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency located at 16 Cooper Street in Hempstead, New York. In Suffolk County the majority of traffic tickets are handled by the Department of Motor Vehicles Traffic Adjudications Bureau located at State Office Building, 2nd Floor, Veterans Memorial Highway,  Hauppauge, NY 11788.

* If you receive six points on your driver record during a period of 18 months, the annual assessment is $100. The minimum amount that you must pay each year is the annual assessment. The total assessment for the three years is $300. If you receive more than six points on your driver record during a period of 18 months, the annual assessment is $25 for each point more than the original six points. The minimum amount that you must pay each year is the annual assessment. The total assessment for the three years is $75 for each point more than the original six points. (See the DMV website link provided above for further information)

Chemical Breath Testing - An Imperfect Device

2011-02-10T16:04:00.000-08:00

CHEMICAL BREATH TESTING

And

Driving While Intoxicated

Blood to Breath Partition Ratio

In New York State, a person can be charged with Driving While Intoxicated pursuant to section 1192.2[1] of the Vehicle and Traffic Law if they operate a motor vehicle while having .08% or more of alcohol in their blood as shown by chemical analysis of their blood, breath, urine or saliva.

Breath testing is based upon the correlation between the amount of alcohol in a person’s breath and blood, and the ability to measure that amount accurately for each individual. In order to convert the breath sample into a blood alcohol percentage, all machines utilize a “Breath to Blood Partition Ratio” of 2100 to 1. This partition ratio essentially states that the amount of alcohol in one milliliter of blood is 2100 times greater than the amount of alcohol in 1 cubic centimeter of expelled breath.

The problem with the 2100 to 1 breath to blood partition ratio used by breath testing instruments is that it does not take into account individual ratios, but rather assumes that everyone has the same partition ratio. Studies have proven that individual breath to blood partition ratios vary among individuals with a range of approximately 1000 to 1 –to- 3000 to 1. What is even more troubling is that the breath to blood partition ratio varies within individuals depending upon which phase of alcohol absorption they are in.

Studies have shown that in the absorptive phase of alcohol digestion, the breath to blood partition ratio is often less than the standard 2100 to 1 figure. Therefore, if you were apply the standard 2100 to 1 breath to blood partition ratio during this phase, it would result in a false high reading. For instance, if an individual submitted to a chemical test that resulted in a reading of 0.10% and the individual had a breath to blood partition ration of 1000 to 1, the actual blood alcohol percent would be .05%. A person who operates a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of .05% is not intoxicated and cannot be charged with Driving While Intoxicated. Conversely, if a person’s breath to blood partition ration is greater then 2100 to 1 the actual concentration of alcohol in their blood would be underestimated if the standard breath to blood partition ratio is used.

So where does all of this leave us? It leaves us guessing as to a person’s true alcohol to blood concentration. The solution to this guessing game is a blood test. The only accurate way to measure the concentration of alcohol in someone’s blood is to test the person’s blood. Hospitals test blood everyday, all day long, and the police have the ability to take and test blood as well. In fact, the police have special blood testing kits that come with instruction cards for drawing and preserving blood for alcohol testing. When a person’s life, liberty and reputation are on the line, we believe that the most accurate testing available should and must be used, and the use of anything less is an injustice.

Filters, Bells and Whistles

Breath testing equipment has been utilized by police departments since the early 1970’s and has been deemed reliable for courts since that time. And yet, the science underlying the equipment still has not been perfected. As I’ve already mentioned, the equipment uses a presumption about an individual’s breath to blood partition ratio, which, depending on the individual and/or the phase of alcohol digestion, may not be accurate. In addition to that, CMI, Inc., the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer series of machines utilized by the Nassau and Suffolk police departments, currently has twenty-four (24) versions of its Intoxilyzer series listed on the New York State Breath Testing Instrument List. Link To NYS Breath Testing Instruments List. If the breath testing equipment is as accurate as it is purported to be, then why do twenty-four (24) different versions of the machine exist? Why isn’t one standard machine used?

The answer is simple. Breath testing has not been perfected, and the companies that manufacture the breath testing machines are continuously trying to discover new ways to improve them. Imagine convicting a person of the crime of Driving While Intoxicated based on the results of the breath machine which indicated that the person was intoxicated, only to find out that a more accurate version of the machine was introduced a week after the person had submitted to the test. Given the very real reality of that situation, we cannot conceive of relying on a machine that is constantly being replaced and updated by new and improved versions when it comes to determining a person’s freedom.

Manufacturers of the breath testing equipment have still not discovered ways to address the following issues:

· Mouth Alcohol – If a subject has undigested alcohol in his mouth due to a burp, dentures, regurgitation or acid reflux, the breath testing machines can be thrown off or fooled into giving a false high reading.

· Breath Sample Duration and Flow – If a person is permitted or instructed to blow into the machine for too long a period of time or with too much or too little force, the machine can be thrown off or fooled into giving a false high reading.

· Trace Contamination – Most breath testing machines use infrared analysis to test for alcohol in the breath, but the infrared wave-lengths that are used test for the methyle group, rather than for the alcohol specific ethyl molecule. Therefore, if a person has a methyle compound in his system, the breath-testing machine will detect alcohol even though the subject has no alcohol in his system. This can occur when a person is exposed to certain paints or wood stains in addition to other compounds that contain molecules in the methyl group.

· Sample Temperature – If a person is sick and his breath sample is even 1 degree above 34 degrees Celsius, it will produce a reading that is approximately 7% higher than his actual reading. Despite this fact, the breath testing machines do not have safeguards to test the temperature of a person’s breath sample and the police do not check a person’s temperature before a breath test is administered.

[1] 2. Driving while intoxicated; per se. No person shall operate a motor vehicle while such person has .08 of one per centum or more by weight of alcohol in the person's blood as shown by chemical analysis of such person's blood, breath, urine or saliva, made pursuant to the provisions of section eleven hundred ninety-four of this article.

DWI ARRESTS = MASSIVE OVERTIME SALARY FOR POLICE

2011-02-02T20:05:00.000-08:00

On January 30th, 2011, Newsday published the Nassau County Police Department salaries and overtime pay for the year ending 2010. Newsday Article

Many officers earned substantial overtime pay as a direct result of arresting individuals suspected of DWI (Driving While Intoxicated or Driving While Impaired).

One officer whose base pay is $106,698.00 earned overtime pay in the amount of $111,508.00. The officer actually earned more money in overtime than he did in regular time, and in total earned $218,206.00 for the year.

Another officer earned $102,970.00 in overtime in addition to his base pay of $106,698.00, for a total yearly income of $209,668.00.

For a complete list of officer income for 2010 click the following link. Newsday Published Salaries

These massive overtime figures lead one to consider the following questions:

Are motorists actually committing the underlying offenses which justify a stop of their motor vehicle in the first instance, or are officers stopping random vehicles on late night shifts trying to score extra overtime?

Imagine the following scenario: A motorist is driving late at night without committing any visible vehicle and traffic law violations. An officer looking to increase his or her salary by earning overtime pay stops the vehicle and asks the motorist where he is coming from and if he has been drinking. If the motorist displays no signs of alcohol consumption, the officer indicates that he or she is going to let the motorist off with a warning to slow down, or to make sure he signals. The motorist is happy that he did not get a ticket and goes home on his merry way, unaware that his rights were just violated by being stopped without cause. On the other hand, if the motorist had displayed signs of alcohol consumption he would have been detained and then arrested. The point is that an officer merely has to say that the reason for the initial stop was speeding, running a stop light or stop sign, or any other vehicle and traffic law violation and the stop is then justified, regardless of whether the motorist actually committed the traffic violation.

Why is the police department scheduling shifts that result in massive overtime pay?

If the vast majority of DWI stops occur in the late evening into early morning hours, why not schedule an officer's tour of duty so that an early morning arrest will not more likely than not result in overtime? If an officer starts his or her shift at midnight, an arrest made during the shift would be processed before noon which would eliminate the need for overtime for the officer to complete arrest paperwork. Obviously, a situation may still arise where an officer earns overtime because of the time of the arrest, but the current tours that are in place almost guarantee that overtime will be paid on every late night/early morning arrest made by an officer.

Only time will tell how the county will solve this massive overtime crisis but one thing is for certain, the current situation needs to be changed as it is ripe for abuse. The taxpayers of Nassau County cannot be expected to continue to foot the bill for officers' exorbitant and unnecessary overtime pay.

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., all clients are presumed innocent. The massive overtime pay that some officers make is troubling and the recent article that appeared in Newsday should open people's eyes to the financial incentive behind initiating unjustified traffic stops and the resultant bad arrests.

Information on David Galison and David Galison, P.C.

2011-01-25T19:10:00.000-08:00

How do you feel about clients educating themselves and utilizing the internet for researching issues relevant to their case?

I encourage clients to educate themselves on the charges alleged by the police. A client who becomes familiar with the charges and elements necessary to obtain a conviction can help point out the deficiencies in the prosecutions case. Clients have a unique knowledge of the facts and often times don’t realize the importance of certain details. After learning about the specific charges alleged, clients are often in a better position to inform me of the facts of the stop and/or arrest. Remember, “Knowledge is power.”

How do you feel about reviewing documents prepared by clients and incorporating their research into the defense?

I often find myself reviewing client research and encourage their participation. Although, I have special training in the legal field often times clients have special training or knowledge on issues that are relevant to the case. An example of this is with diabetics and DWI stops. A client’s special knowledge of the disease and how it can impact their case is vital information required for a proper defense. Having handled many DWI / diabetes cases I have become extremely knowledgeable about the disease and it’s impact on DWI testing. Much of this knowledge came directly from clients and their participation is appreciated and encouraged.

Are you willing to coach clients who want to represent themselves?

You know the saying “A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client.” I am not in favor of clients representing themselves, particularly when the client has no formal legal training. Rules of evidence are complicated and knowing how to properly conduct a trial takes years of training and experience. I am in favor of clients participating heavily in formulating the defensive strategy. If a client chooses to represent themselves in court, I can be retained to “Second Seat” the pro-se litigant. This way if you have an issue with the judge or courtroom procedures I can be consulted with immediately.

What influenced your decision to purse a legal career?

My father, grandfather and several uncles all played a part in my choosing the legal profession. I was raised often hearing legal war stories and found myself drawn into the field. Since my first experience in the courtroom I knew that I had made the right decision.

What work experience and education helps you be a better lawyer?

Prior to becoming a lawyer I worked many jobs in the service industries that put me in direct contact with the public. It was during these years that I developed my people skills that I find so helpful with a jury.

During law school I worked in the law library where I learned how to properly research legal issues. You would be surprised to learn how many resources there are available to an attorney when unique or novel questions of law are presented.

Why did you decide on your primary area of practice?

As I mentioned earlier my father is an attorney and he is the major reason that I started practicing criminal defense. At this point, I can’t see any other area of law that would interest me. I love defending clients, and protecting their rights.

What do you like best about your career?

I like being in court and fighting to protect client’s rights. There is nothing worse then feeling helpless when the power of the state is prosecuting you. I love being able to fight for clients facing the criminal process who are unable to fight for themselves. I love the fact that my client’s know that I am fighting for them.

What are your strengths and style?

I am always ready for trial and will not back down to the district attorney. I will tell you like it is from the start so that you can know what to expect. This straight forward advise will enable you to determine if you should go to trial, try for a reduction or plea to the charge. If you are looking for a lawyer who is confident, knowledgeable and ready to fight to protect your rights then you will like my style. My goal is to provide the best results for my client’s.

Personal Interests and hobbies:

Although I seem to be working seven days a week, when I’m not working I participate in triathlon events, surf, and spend time with my fiancé and my children.

Nassau County DWI Website Launched By The Law Firm of David Galison, P.C. For New York Drivers Facing Drunk Driving Charges

2011-01-16T08:59:00.000-08:00

Nassau County Attorney Launches Website Dedicated to Educate Residents About the Dangers and Legal Ramifications of Driving While Impaired by Alcohol and Drugs.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Jan 15, 2011 – The Law Offices of David Galison, P.C. announced the launch of their new website at www.galisonlaw.com. This new website answers the most common questions that someone facing DWI charges in New York State could have. How cases are processed, what police can do and how prosecutors look at these cases.The firm focuses in Criminal Defense, DWI Defense and Traffic Ticket Defense. Located at 1539 Franklin Avenue in Mineola, the firm serves Nassau, Suffolk and Queens County, New York. The user-friendly site offers information about the firm’s practice areas and attorney, as well as industry information and news.

“The New York State laws concerning DWI and DWU can be complex and sometimes confusing, and they can severely diminish both your freedom and finances,” says David Galison, managing partner of the Law Office of David Galison . He goes on to say that,"An arrest and conviction for DWI can affect the rest of your life. With such serious consequences on the line, every client needs personalized attention." The new website is designed for Nassau County drivers facing drunk driving charges and explains what onecan expect to confront by these serious charges and what someone needs to know to better protect themselves

Topics covered on the DWI site include:

Nassau County DWI;

DWI v. DUA;

Drug Impairment;

Breathalyzer/Intoxilyzer;

DWI & DUA Penalties;

License Suspension;

Possible Jail Time;

Vehicle Forfeiture Law;

Other DWI Penalties;

NY State DWI Penalty Chart.

The site is an effort to take the Law Office of David Galison, P.C. to the next level in terms of technology. It is a great source of information for clients and those simply requiring concise information. The law firm worked closely with a creative services firm located in Point Lookout, NY to design and build the site.

Visitors to the site can read about the company’s history and services, as well as access news, events and resources within the legal industry.

For more information, visit www.galisonlaw.com, or contact David Galison at 516-424-4477 or by email to david@galisonlaw.com.

About The Law Office of David Galison, P.C.:

At the Law Office of David Galison, P.C., it is understood that an arrest and conviction for any crime can affect the rest of your life. With such serious consequences on the line, every client receives personalized attention. Clients are kept fully informed of their case's progress and actively participate in their defense throughout all stages of the proceedings. It is the personal service that David Galison, P.C. provides to the client that sets the office apart from other law firms.